List of References 

Anderson, E. 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

—‘What is the Point of Equality?’, Ethics 109/2 (1999), pp.287-337.

—‘The Fundamental Disagreement between Luck Egalitarians and Relational Egalitarians’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 40:sup1 (2010), pp.1-23.

Alperovitz, Gar. 2005. America Beyond Capitalism. Reclaiming Our Wealth, Our Liberty, and Our Democracy. Democracy Collaborative Press. 

—2017. Principles of a Pluralist Commonwealth. https://thenextsystem.org/principles 

Ashcraft, Richard. 1998. ‘John Stuart Mill and the Theoretical Foundations of Democratic Socialism’ in Eldon J. Eisenach edited Mill and the Moral Character of Liberalism. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Bernstein, Eduard (ed.). 1925. Die Briefe von Friedrich Engels an Eduard Bernstein. Mit Briefen von Karl Kautsky an ebendemselben. Berlin: Dietz. 

—1899. Die Voraussetzungen des Sozialismus und die Aufgaben der Sozialdemokratie. Stuttgart: Dietz. 

Baum, Bruce. 2007. ‘J.S. Mill and Liberal Socialism’, Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras edited, J.S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, pp.98-123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  

— 1998. ‘J.S. Mill on Freedom and Power’, Polity, 31/2, pp.187-216.

— 1999. ‘J.S. Mill’s Conception of Economic Freedom’, History of Political Thought 20/3, pp.494-530.

Berger, Fred R. 1982. ‘Mill’s Substantive Principles of Justice: A Comparison with Nozick’, American Philospophical Quarterly, 19/4, pp.373-380.

Bowles, S. 2004. Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

—2012. The New Economics of Inequality and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—2016. The Moral Economy – Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens. New Haven: Yale University Press. 

Bowles, S., S. D. Halliday. 2021. Microeconomics: Competition, Conflict and Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  

Brink, David. 2013. Mill’s Progressive Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Claeys, Gregory. 1987. ‘Justice, Independence, and Industrial Democracy: The Development of John Stuart Mill’s Views on Socialism’, Journal of Politics 49/1, pp.122-147.

Clark, Barry S., and Elliott, John E. 2001. ‘John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Justice’, Review of Social Economy, 59/4, pp.467-490.

Cohen, G.A. 1978. Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defense. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 

—1995. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, H. 1904. Die Ethik des reinen Willens. Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Georg Olms 1981. 

—1919. Religion der Vernunft aus den Quellen des Judentums. Darmstadt: Metzler 1966.

Ekelund, Robert B. and Tollison, Robert D. 1976. ‘The New Political Economy of J.S. Mill: The Means to Social Justice’, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 9/2, pp.213-231.

Ferro, B. 2022 From Rechtsphilosophie to Staatsökonomie: Hegel and the philosophical foundations of political economy, European Journal of Philosophy, 1–17.

Feuer, Lewis S. 1946. ‘J.S. Mill and Marxian Socialism’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 10/2, pp.297-304.

Fredman, L.E. and Gordon, B.L.J. 1967. ‘John Stuart Mill and Socialism’, Mill Newsletter 3/1, pp.3-7.

Fichte, J. G. 1796/97. Foundations of Natural Right. Ed. Frederick Neuhouser and trans. Michael Baur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 

—1800. The Closed Commercial State. Trans. A.C. Curtis Adler. Albany, NY: SUNY Press 2013.

—1964-2012. Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Ed. Reinhard Lauth and Hans Gliwitzky. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.

Hainds, J.R. 1946. ‘John Stuart Mill and the Saint-Simonians’, Journal of the History of Ideas 7/1, pp.103-12.

Hegel, G.W.F. 1820. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. H.B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993. 

—1983a. Philosophie des Rechts: Die Mitschriften Wannenmann (Heidelberg 1817/18) and Homeyer (Berlin 1818/19). Ed. Karl-Heinz Ilting. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

—1983b. Die Philosophie des Rechts: Die Vorlesungen von 1819/20 in einer Nachschrift. Ed. Dieter Henrich. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. 

—2000. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie des Rechts. Berlin 1819/20. Ed. Emil Angehrn, Martin Bondeli, and Hoo Nam Seelman. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

Heisenberg, T. 2018. “Hegel on the value of the market economy,” European Journal of Philosophy 26:4, 1283-1296.

–2022. “Hegel and the Problem of Affluence,” Journal of the APA 8:2, 224 – 237.

Herzog, L. 2013. Inventing the Market: Smith, Hegel and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Presss. 

—2015. Two Ways of Taming the Market. In: Hegel and Capitalism. Ed. A. Buchwalter, 147-162. Albany: SUNY Press.

Hollander, Samuel. 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill, Volume 2: Political Economy. Oxford: Blackwell.

Holzhey, H. (ed). 1986. Der Marburger Neukantianismus in Quellen. Basel: Schwabe 

Honneth,. A. 2016. The Idea of Socialism: Towards a Renewal. Cambridge: Polity Press.  

Jaeggi, R. 2014. Critique of Forms of Life. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, 2018. 

—Alienation. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.

Jaeggi, R. and N. Fraser. 2018. Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Lange, F.A. 1870. Die Arbeiterfrage. Ihre Bedeutung für Gegenwart und Zukunft. 2nd ed. Winterthur: von Beuler-Hausheer&Co. 

—1866. Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. 

—1866. J. St. Mill’s Ansichten über die soziale Frage und die angebliche Umwälzung der Sozialwissenschaft durch Carey. Duisburg: Falk&Lange.

Losman, Donald L. 1971. ‘J.S. Mill on Alternative Economic Systems’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 30/1, pp.84-104.

Luxemburg, R. 1900. Social Reform or Revolution? Trans. Integer. London: Militant Publications 1986. 

—1913. The Accumulation of Capital. Trans. A. Schwarzschild. London: Routledge 1951. 

—1976. The National Question. Selected Writings. Ed. by Horace Davis. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Kurer, Oskar. 1992. ‘J.S. Mill and Utopian Socialism’, The Economic Record 68/202, pp.222-32. 

—The Politics of Progress (London: Garland, 1991).

McCabe, Helen. 2012. ‘Mill and Socialism: A Reply to Capaldi’, The Tocqueville Review 30/1 (2012), pp.145-164.

—2015. ‘John Stuart Mill’s Analysis of Capitalism and the Road to Socialism’, A New Social Question: Capitalism, Socialism and Utopia edited by Casey Harrison, pp.8-22. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

—2018. ‘John Stuart Mill and Fourierism: “Association”, “Friendly Rivalry” and Distributive Justice’, Global Intellectual History 4/1, pp.35-61.

— 2019. ‘Navigating by the North Star: The Role of the “Ideal” in John Stuart Mill’s View of “Utopian” Schemes and the Possibilities of Social Transformation’, Utilitas, 31/3, pp.291-309. 

—2020. ‘Mill’s “Modern” Radicalism Re-Examined: Joseph Persky’s The Political Economy of Progress’, Utilitas 32/2, pp.147-164.

—2020. ‘All of “liberty, equality and fraternity”, which is capable of being realised’: John Stuart Mill on ‘legitimate socialism’ and the revolutions of 1848’, Revue Philosophique de France et de l’Étranger 145/3, pp.333-351. 

—2019. ‘“There never was a time when so great a drama was being played out in one generation”: John Stuart Mill and the French Revolution of 1848’, Revue d’études proudhoniennes, 5, pp.119-162.

Marx, K., F. Engels. 1975-2004. Collected Works. 50 volumes. London: Lawrence & Wishart

Medearis, John. 2005. ‘Labor, Democracy, Utility, and Mill’s Critique of Private Property’, American Journal of Political Science 49/1, pp.135-149.

Nance, M. 2019. Property and Economic Planning in Fichte’s Contractualism. European Journal of Philosophy 27:643-660. 

Mill, John Stuart. 1963-1991. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. 33 volumes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 

Miller, Dale E. 2003. ‘Mill’s “Socialism”’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 2/2, pp.213-38.

Morales, Maria. 1996. ‘Perfect Equality’: John Stuart Mill on Well-Constituted Communities. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

Nathanson, Stephen. 2012. ‘John Stuart Mill on Economic Justice and the Alleviation of Poverty’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 43/2, pp.161-176.

Natorp, P. 1920. Sozial-Idealismus. Neue Richtlinien sozialer Erziehung. Berlin: Julius Springer.

—1899. Sozialpädagogik. Theorie der Willenserziehung auf der Grundlage der Gemeinschaft. Stuttgart: Frommanns Verlag.

Patton, L.. Rosa Luxemburg. In The Oxford Handbook of Nineteenth-Century Women Philosophers in the German Tradition, ed. K. Gjesdal and D. Nassar, forthcoming. 

Persky, Joseph. 2016. The Political Economy of Progress: John Stuart Mill and Modern Radicalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

— 2020. ‘Mill’s Socialism Re-Examined’, Utilitas 32/2, pp.165-180. 

Piketty, T. About Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Trans. A. Goldhammer. New Haven: Harvard University Press. 

—Capital and Ideology. Trans. A. Goldhammer. New Haven: Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

—Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

—2007. Lectures in the History of Political Philosophy, edited Samuel Freeman. London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Riley, Jonathan. 1996. ‘J.S. Mill’s Liberal Utilitarian Assessment of Capitalism versus Socialism’, Utilitas 8/1, pp.39-71.

Roemer, J. 1988. Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

—1996. Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

—1994. A Future for Socialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sandkühler, H.J., R. de la Vega (ed.). 1974. Marxismus und Ethik. Texte zum neukantianischen Sozialismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Sarvasy, Wendy. 1985. ‘A Reconsideration of the Development and Structure of John Stuart Mill’s Socialism’, The Western Political Quarterly, 38/2, pp.312-33.

Savigny, Friedrich Carl von. 1840-1848. System des heutigen römischen Recht. 8 volumes. Berlin: Bei Veit und Comp.

Satz, Debra. 2010. Why Some Things Should Not Be For Sale. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Simmel, G. 1897, Rosen. Eine soziale Hypothese. Jugend 2: 390-2.

—1900a Philosophy of Money. Trans. T. Bottomore and D. Frisby. London: Routledge, 2004.

—1900b, Sozialismus und Pessimismus. Die Zeit 22 (274): 70-71.

—1908, Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms. Trans. A. J. Blasi, A.K. Jacobs, and M Kanjirathinkal. Leiden: Brill, 2009.

—1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Ed. by K.H. Wolff. NY: FreePress, 1950.

Shoikhebrod, I. 2019. Revisting Marx’s Critique of Liberalism: Rethinking Justice, Legality and Rights.

Stafford, William. 1998. ‘How Can a Paradigmatic Liberal Call Himself a Socialist? The Case of John Stuart Mill’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 3/3, pp.325-45.

Stammler. R. 1896.: Wirtschaft und Recht nach der materialistischen Geschichtsauffassung. Eine sozialphilosophische Untersuchung. Leipzig: Verlag von Veit&Comp.

Stephen, James Fitzjames. 1882. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. New York: H. Holt and Company.

Taylor, Harriet. 1998. Complete Works of Harriet Taylor Mill, edited Jo Ellen Jacobs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Tawney, R.H. 1920. The Acquisitive Society. New York Harcourt, Brace, and Company 

Turner, Piers Norris. 2019. ‘Luck and Distributive Justice in Mill’, The Routledge Handbook of Theories of Luck, edited by. Ian M. Church and Robert J. Hartman, pp.80-93. Routledge.

—2020. ‘Mill’s Evolutionary Theory of Justice: Reflections on Persky’, Utiltas 32/2, pp.131-146.

Trendelenburg, A. 1843. Die logische Frage in Hegels System. Zwei Streitschriften. Leizpig: F. A. Brockhaus. 

—1856. Herbarts praktische Philosophie und die Ethik der Alten. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften. 

Vorländer, K. 1903. Die neukantische Bewegung im Sozialismus. Kant-Studien 8: 329-335.

—Kant und der Sozialismus. in: Kant-Studien 5:361-412.